(Before we get started, I want to encourage you to stick
around for the whole post: We have tons
of reader mail to cover!)
The violet fungus is a common subterranean hazard. It’s a danger in and of itself,
especially if the PCs are inexperienced.
(“Well if it’s a plant, we’ll just pepper it with arrows from here, then—wait,
what do you mean it’s headed straight for us?”) But more likely you’ll encounter it in a nasty combo: the
fungus plus the troglodytes or vegepygmies or whatever else was lying it wait
until you’d had several Str and Con points shaved off your scores.
A grove of violet fungi
hides yet another danger—great purple-bodied myceloids. These are not the usual spore-spreading
slavers, however. If adventurers
will aid them against a tribe of local morlocks, the mushroom creatures promise
to free them—maybe even uninfected.
In his yearly
ceremonial role as Lord Autumn, a viscount reviews choice produce at the
High Harvest Festival. At one
stand, a farmer unboxes all manner of mushrooms…including a violet fungus kept
iced down to render it inert.
Before anyone can react, the farmer rips off one of the fungus’s
tentacles and whips the viscount with it repeatedly. During the (unsuccessful) hurry to save the noble, the
farmer succumbs to rot himself before he can be questioned. What—or who—drove him to this act? The fungus might offer clues…provided
it is not allowed to thaw and reanimate.
On the road to the
dark elf city of Jarpannus, membership in the Purple Mark, a league of
subterranean rangers, virtually guarantees acceptance in any cave caravan. One of the prerequisites for joining is
to fight a violet fungus. Simply defeating
the mushroom is not enough—the would-be ranger must survive the rot to prove
his fortitude and willingness to endure disfigurement in the service of his
clients.
—Pathfinder Bestiary
274
I suppose this is just a hazard of the phylum, but man, the
violet fungus in the Bestiary is a
rather…adult-looking specimen, don’t
you think?
I’m way behind on reader comments—February brought a return
to 12-hour workdays—so let’s tackle some of those. Forgive me if I don’t do my usual hyperlinking to the
original comment/commenter; for time reasons I’m sacrificing links in favor of
cut-and-paste to give more folks their say:
From uwtartarus:
I think it is
interesting that Vespergaunts (aww... yiss! more Dark Tapestry critters) can
grant wishes, but unlike genies or glabrezu, they can straight up use their own
Wish spell-like ability. That could be a way to generate a great
reversal on the heroes just as they think they have won.
Indeed!
And jenna-darknight speaks truth:
While I’ve always had
mixed feelings about Lovecraftian horrors in D&D, I’ve got to say that the
Pathfinder guys really have done a good job with the monsters they have
included. They’re difficult to
deal with, even if you are prepared, and just generally awful. Also, by the time they’re likely to
come into play most adventurers have gotten jaded to the standard horrors. Skeletons and the like don’t hold any
terror anymore, but throw something coated in eyes within eyes who speak in the
voice of a thousand screams and basically should not be are a great way to
throw them for a loop.
She also does one of my favorite things in the world, which
is propose a campaign out of the Core and just one splatbook:
3.5e’s Lords of Madness, while really designed for Aboleths, Mindflayers and Grell, lends
itself very nicely to the Lovecraftian horrors of Pathfinder, especially the
feats and PrCs (I’m partial to the of the Keeper of the Cerulean Sign myself). One could easily build a campaign out
of that splatbook and the Pathfinder horrors.
…and now I have a
terrible terrible idea for a Gaslight Ustalav game I need to go write down.
WRITE IT DOWN.
AND THEN SHARE IT WITH US.
THIS, I COMMAND! (Please?)
Meanwhile, some of you are being way too nice to me.
From regurgiturd:
I think I’d really
enjoy running in a campaign of your creation. Keep the ideas flowin, this
great!
Dawww, you are too kind. You actually don’t want me as your GM; it’s been so long
since I’ve been behind the screen that I’d be clumsy and slow and awful. But I totally volunteer to sit around
brainstorming with your GM,
preferably by the fire over big glasses of porter.
And then fortooate doubled down:
I was sort of
extremely thrilled when you mentioned The Dresden Files on here! It's like hearing Joss Whedon talk about how cool Neil
Gaiman's work is, or something. :D
Did…did I just get compared to Joss Whedon? I CAN DIE NOW. (Actually, no, I have work to do.) But thanks!
Yeah, I love the Dresden
Files, especially on audiobook—I’ve actually never read them, so I don’t
know how well they live on the page, but they are practically perfect as listens: excellently paced; great
characters; a constant sense of escalation, both in each book and over the
course of the series; a rich, coherent modern magical world without being
overly complicated—I could go on and on.
I think Jim Butcher should be recommended reading for anyone trying to
run a modern fantasy or urban fantasy campaign…the only risk being that the
books are so good you might find yourself inevitably trying to replicate them
rather than just drawing inspiration from them, which is a very subtle trap.
Speaking of which, one of the things I’ve been very
consciously doing over the past few years is expand my fantasy
reading/listening. I may have
talked about this before, but a few years back NPR did this flowchart of fantasy and sci-fi books, and I was stunned to discover that I’d read more of
the sci-fi books listed than fantasy.
I think of myself as a fantasy reader, but that’s because growing up I
read deeply in a narrow band—all the
Pern books, all the Dragonlance
books, etc.—while in sci-fi I’ve dabbled, but always dabbled in quality. So the end result is I’ve read many
more of sci-fi’s greatest hits, but there are now huge gaps in my fantasy greatest hits that I’m trying to
close.
(By the way, currently in my car is Daniel Abraham’s The Dragon’s Path, which so far is a
fantastic listen. Don’t be fooled
by the lame cover.)
(One more note: One of the interesting things about The Dresden Files is how (largely) apparently effortlessly good they
are. I didn’t realize how hard it
is to write good modern fantasy until I encountered bad (read: most) modern fantasy. The entire private eye-who-is-also-a-wizard/vampire/faerie
genre in particular is excruciatingly
bad. And while Jim Butcher’s name
on the cover is a good sign, a Jim Butcher blurb on the back cover is no
guarantee: Beware and be prepared to hit eject on the CD player.)
Where were we?
More reader comments! Slim
Naccache chimes about the viduus:
I definitively LOVE
the first idea. It could make an
entire campaign, when you think about it...in Planescape: Torment style. It works better if you really know your players and the kind
of characters they like to play. Just
tell them "Create a character, just a sheet, no background, without alignment,
just a class and race."
And AlgaeNymph writes:
Great adventure seeds
for Vildeis, Wes Schneider himself would probably have a hard time doing
better.
Which is just crazy talk! Don’t listen to him, Wes! You can tell by the comma splice that AlgaeNymph is most
likely insane and definitely short one intestine. (Because he’s missing his…semicolon.
#punctuationjokes!)
I kid because I love.
Anyway, AN goes on to say:
The real reason I'm
here, however, is to plug a thread where I discuss my concerns and complaints
about Vildeis' stats (among other things): [link]
I’ve heard vague rumblings about Bestiary 4 empyreal lords’ stats being off, so if you’ve heard
those rumblings, too, I’ll let AlgaeNymph’s link point you toward the
conversation.
By the way, for the record I spend very little time on the Paizo boards—I simply don’t have the time
or mental bandwidth—which means I miss a lot of commentary and controversy, as
well as the official, semiofficial, and nonofficial replies. So if I’ve missed some burning
controversy or James Jacobs-related wisdom, feel free to let me know!
I was going to talk about something else I don’t have the
bandwidth for, but this post has already gotten crazy long, so I’m going to
save it for tomorrow, when we talk about…
PORN.
(Not really.
I’m intentionally being provocative to get you here tomorrow. But now that I’ve said it, dare you
look away? See you in 24 hours.)
Oh hey! I was
supposed to be in Illinois this weekend.
That went out the window because of snow—super disappointing, given how
much I was looking forward to seeing my family and all the hours reading on the
plane—but it means I have a radio show for you.
(If the feed skips, use Save As to snag it as an mp3 and enjoy
in iTunes. Link good till Friday,
2/14, at midnight.)
No comments:
Post a Comment